God Answers Prayers: Judge Refuses to Force Baker to Promote Gay Marriage

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A Bakersfield judge denied the State of California’s request to force a Christian wedding cake designer, Cathy Miller, to create a custom cake to help a lesbian couple celebrate their wedding. To do so, said Superior Court Judge David Lampe, “would do violence” to Cathy’s free speech rights protected by the First Amendment.

Monday’s decision came after the two sides argued their case for several hours before Judge Lampe at the Kern County Superior Court last Friday. The lesbian couple, Mireya and Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio, represented by California Department of Fair Employment and Housing attorneys, claimed Miller had violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of characteristics including race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.

Miller’s pro-bono attorney from the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF), Charles LiMandri, disputed that accusation.

“Cathy would never discriminate against anyone who walks through her bakery’s doors. She will gladly serve anyone, including same-sex couples,” LiMandri said. “But Cathy will not use her artistic talents to express messages that conflict with her sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage.”

In the end, Judge Lampe agreed with LiMandri’s assessment. His judgement read:

No artist, having placed their work for public sale, may refuse to sell for an unlawful discriminatory purpose. No baker may place their wares in a public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification.

The difference here is that the cake in question is not yet baked. The State is not petitioning the court to order defendants to sell a cake. The State asks this court to compel Miller to use her talents to design and create a cake she has not yet conceived with the knowledge that her work will be displayed in celebration of a marital union her religion forbids. For this court to force such compliance would do violence to the essentials of Free Speech guaranteed under the First Amendment.

An hour before last Friday’s hearing, Miller gathered outside the court house for a prayer rally with over 250 supporters.  Bakersfield City Councilwoman Jacquie Sullivan, Pastor Wendell Vinson of Canyon Hills Assembly of God, Pastor Angelo Frazier with River Lakes Community Church, and Miller’s pastor, Roger Spradlin of Valley Baptist Church led the crowd in prayer. If the judge had decided against Miller, she could have lost her bakery she calls Tastries. Wedding cakes makes up 40 percent of Miller’s business.

There were some concerns that a handful of sign waving protesters attending the rally might disrupt the event. Prayer rally coordinator Jonathan Keller, CEO of the California Family Council, was able to ease the tension by acknowledging everyone’s First Amendment rights. “We have some people hear today that disagree with us, but that’s fine. It’s part of the beauty of what it means to be in America,” Keller told the crowd. “The First Amendment that gives us a right to assemble, freely speak, and freely practice our religion gives them those same rights.”

Miller used the rally as an opportunity to explain her perspective on this controversy and how her Christian faith influences how she runs her bakery.

 

“We are not here because of cakes or sexual orientation. Those are just the catalyst that have brought us together to face the real issue: Religious Freedom, our First Amendment Rights, and the purpose of what we do,” Miller explained.  “As a Christian, my heart and soul belong to Jesus; that cannot and will not change. That is why I do what I do, and live by the convictions I have. Personally, I am incapable of doing something that knowingly would hurt or disrespect my Lord and Savior. It is as simple as that. …”

“I would hope that as Americans, we can respect each other’s beliefs and understand it is possible to live in a society where those that have strong religious convictions can honor God in every aspect of their life and work… and still love others who may not have those same convictions.”

“At the same time, people who may not share the same convictions can still respect others and not force them into a situation where they must choose between their conscience and their life occupation.”

According to Daniel Piedra, FCDF Executive Director, where the case goes now is in the hands of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. If the state continues to pursue the case against Miller’s bakery, Piedra is confident Miller will prevail.

“This is a significant victory for faith and freedom because the judge indicated in his ruling that the State cannot succeed in this case as a matter of law,” said LiMandri. “No doubt the California officials will continue their persecution of Cathy, but it is clear that she has the Constitution on her side.”

**Read Judge Lampe’s decision for yourself. It’s a beautiful defense of our constitutional right to free speech!

(8) Comments

  1. A tremendous victory for our LORD-GOD of Israel-JESUS of Nazareth. Astonishing & beautiful….RMA; Bakersfield, Ca….

    Reply
  2. Thank God for Cathy Miller’s strong moral,biblical belief & FAITH!!!Gay marriage ‘SUCKS!’And so do those who support it!Go somewhere else to have your cake made if it effects the merchants’ personal faith,beliefs & deep moral principles(& quit being a trouble maker!)THAT ARE VERSED IN GOD’S WORD;THE BIBLE, not only as SINFUL but an abomination in God’s eyes!Sorry to use such strong verbal language above but in the ‘similar case’ of the man(Baker,I believe)with the same ‘moral conviction’ gnawing at him to do what the Holy Spirit led him to do that was TRUE in God’s eyes as the right choice & followed his Godly Faith,went through so much harassment,chaos,verbal abuse by the gay couple,business loss of over 40% & much worse!Even though the merchant was still willing to give the couple a cake nevertheless not ‘customized against’ his own STRONG moral standards & personal relationship with the almighty-Jesus & our Father,God!!!Praise God,this Judge had the moral ‘conviction’ to ‘see’ what was the right thing to do!!!

    Reply
  3. This was the only decision the judge could have made that would square with our constitutional right of freedom of religion. Ruling otherwise would have conveyed the erroneous message that one does not have the right to abide by his faith convictions.

    Reply
  4. Wonderful verdict! Back to the original intention of the law. Everyone’s freedom to express what they sincerely believe.

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *