Good News: Law Penalizing “Misgendering” with Hefty Fine and/or Jail Time being Legally Challenged

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A lawsuit has been filed against a recently signed California law that inflicts fines and/or jail time on employees who “misgender” a patient within a senior care facility. SB 219, enacted last October, was introduced by state senator Scott Weiner (D-San Francisco) and sponsored by Equality California. It penalizes senior healthcare workers who “misgender” any patients identifying as transgender by failing to address the patient by their preferred gender pronouns. Any employees who “willfully or repeatedly violate” SB 219 could be charged with a misdemeanor and subject to punishment of a $1000 fine, or even up to one year in jail.

This new law strips away the realities of physiological characteristics and instead implies that a person can change their gender by self identifying as a male, female, or even neither (non-binary). Worse yet, the government is seeking to punish those who do not comply with this new atrocious law.

Thankfully, this law is being legally challenged.

The case Taking Offense v. State of California is being brought by Llewellyn Law Office’ Attorney David Llewellyn on behalf of several unnamed clients and is challenging the law as “unconstitutionally vague and over broad.”

The lawsuit also argues that the law violates “constitutional protections of equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, [as well as] Article 1, Section 7 of the California Constitution.” The lawsuit also points out that the law imposes an unconstitutional religious preference, and “censors and licenses private speech, in violation of the principles of freedom of expression in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, [as well as] Article 1, Section 2(a) of the California State Constitution. The suit also challenges the law on the basis that it requires conformity to the constructs of sexual fluidity, or gender preference.

This is pure coercion.

Gender is not fluid, and it is absolutely unnecessary and dangerous to have laws that force other people to accept someone else’s gender identity based solely on their personal choice. The government’s decision to force people of faith to accept these fluid personal gender preferences or face fines and/or imprisonment is a great affront to our Constitution. Gender is not a personal choice that people make, but rather a biological fact based on characteristics present even prior to birth. Let’s pray the courts recognize this law for what it is.

According to Llewellyn, the case, filed on December 4, 2017, is active and waiting for a court hearing date.

(3) Comments

  1. “So GOD created man in HIS own image/male & female created HE them!” Genesis 1:27 There are only these two genders accoridng to Holy Scripture now & forever!!!! No such thing as transgender; not now not ever!!!!So let it be written; so let it be done!!!!RMA; Bakerfield, CA…….

    Reply
  2. I don’t see what this has to do with prepping. I know several individuals who have or are in the process of gender reassignment and they have never felt that they were actually the gender they were born with. I believe it is a personal choice that one can make WHEN THEY HAVE REACHED LEGAL AGE. That being said, I don’t believe that young children should be asked whether they feel that they are the correct gender because they are still growing and learning and becoming. I also don’t agree with the actions of the principal, his sexuality is nothing to discuss with the children in his school. If a female teacher had breast augmentation she surely wouldn’t broadcast it to the whole school! The states that are imposing laws(fines and jail time) for using the incorrect gender pronouns obviously need to focus on real crimes. Yes we should address people the way they want to be addressed, but as a woman with very short hair, I’ve been called sir or he on occasion and don’t need to fine someone for it. How many doctors have been called Mr. instead of Dr? That being said, I don’t believe that this has much bearing on prepping issues. I usually enjoy the content on your site, but it kind of seems like you got on a political soap box about this. Just saying

    Reply
  3. Gener is not fluid and for the government to force people of faith to accept these fluid personal gender preferences and face fines/ and or imprisonment is a great mishandling of our constitution. (I agree with these statements made above).

    Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *